No Images? Click here President Donald Trump unveiled his long-delayed infrastructure proposal on Monday, an initiative meant to spur investment in the nation’s crumbling roads, bridges, and waterways. However, the plan is a far cry from his populist campaign rhetoric, in which he promised to unleash a grand national renewal not seen since the days of Dwight Eisenhower.While the plan includes a shiny topline number ― a $1.5 trillion investment in infrastructure ― the substance of the package is decidedly less than meets the eye. The proposal seeks to turn just $200 billion in direct federal spending over the next decade into nearly seven times that number by leveraging state and local tax dollars as well as private investment. The American Society of Civil Engineers, meanwhile, says the U.S. needs to invest $4.59 trillion in infrastructure by 2025.Trump himself seems skeptical of the scheme, according to NBC News. Indeed, in private conversations with lawmakers last year, the president repeatedly criticized the plan’s core concept of using public-private partnerships to finance infrastructure projects.The administration’s proposal would theoretically spur additional investment in infrastructure by sharply reducing federal cost-sharing for projects to no more than 20 percent of the costs, down from the traditional 80 percent. The massive reduction in federal dollars would place a greater onus on state and local officials to find revenue to fund the construction of new projects ― which in many cases would likely mean allowing more tolls or usage fees to create revenue streams to lure in private investors.WHAT ELSE IS HAPPENING?Another detail from the infrastructure plan: it would give states more flexibility to toll existing interstate highways, under the rationale that if you use a road, you ought to pay a price in order to maintain it. It’s not a new idea, nor is it a partisan one.Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, regularly flies first or business class, often costing American taxpayers thousands of dollars more than equivalent seats in coach, according to a news report.A political science professor with no management experience and controversial views about redistricting is no longer being considered for the top operational role at the Census Bureau.ICYMI
How will Trump’s administration impact you? Sign up for our email and find out.Did a friend send you this? Subscribe here. Like what you see? Share it. Want more? Here are two other newsletters you'll love: The Morning Email and Must Reads.©2018 HuffPost | 770 Broadway, New York, NY 10003 |
Monday, February 12, 2018
Trump's new infrastructure plan is kind of underwhelming
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment